<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Subject &#8211; Semiotica</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.semiotica.org/tag/subject/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.semiotica.org</link>
	<description>Dalla scienza dei segni alla semiotica del testo. Il campo semiotico e le teorie della significazione</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 07:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Zemic Model: Body, Person, Praxis, Values</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/the-zemic-model-body-person-praxis-values/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 17:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eero Tarasti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subject]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In existential semiotics, Eero Tarasti introduces the notion of the&#160;zemic world&#160;as the fundamental structure of empirical existence. This model articulates Dasein into four interconnected entities: body, person, praxis, and values, which Tarasti designates respectively as Moi1, Moi2, Soi2, and Soi1. The zemic world is not a static configuration but a dynamic field in which meaning...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Multiple Subjectivities and Cultural Complexity</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/multiple-subjectivities-and-cultural-complexity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guido Ferraro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subject]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the typology outlined by Guido Ferraro, subjectivity is no longer merely collective or intersubjective, but appears fragmented, plural, and unstable. It is the subjectivity of the age of complexity: a composite identity made up of elements that are at times even incoherent with one another. Not a higher synthesis, but a dynamic and often...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semiotics of Orality: Sense in Action, Body and Voice in Enunciation</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/semiotics-of-orality-sense-in-action-body-and-voice-in-enunciation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immanence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrizia Violi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics of orality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics of Passions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subject]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Patrizia Violi proposes to consider a specific form of the&#160;arts du faire: the&#160;art du dire. According to her, semiotics has long neglected this form of meaning production: its textualist tradition has led it to privilege the analysis of already textualized products rather than the practices that generate meaning. The discipline, in other words, has focused...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
