<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Semiosis &#8211; Semiotica</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.semiotica.org/tag/semiosis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.semiotica.org</link>
	<description>Dalla scienza dei segni alla semiotica del testo. Il campo semiotico e le teorie della significazione</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:39:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Detotalizing Method: Thinking Beyond Globalization</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/the-detotalizing-method-thinking-beyond-globalization/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 10:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aesthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immanuel Kant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Petrilli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Albert Sebeok]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In&#160;Semiotics in Ethics and Caring,&#160;Susan Petrilli&#160;introduces what she calls a&#160;detotalizing method&#160;as a necessary epistemological and ethical stance for contemporary semiotics. This method emerges from a critique of totalizing models of knowledge and communication, particularly those associated with globalization, technicism, and disciplinary separatism. Against these tendencies, Petrilli proposes a mode of inquiry capable of accounting for...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Semiotic Animal and the Ethics of Responsibility</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/the-semiotic-animal-and-the-ethics-of-responsibility/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Augusto Ponzio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bachtin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metasemiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics and Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Petrilli]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Susan Petrilli develops the notion of&#160;semioethics&#160;by grounding it in a specific conception of the human being: the human as&#160;semiotic animal. This expression, introduced in the volume&#160;Semiotic Animal&#160;co-authored with John Deely and Augusto Ponzio, designates a life form endowed not only with the capacity for semiosis, but with a distinctive aptitude for&#160;metasemiosis—the ability to reflect on...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Umberto Eco, Code and Message: Two Fundamental Notions</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/umberto-eco-code-and-message-two-fundamental-notions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 20:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferdinand de Saussure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Jakobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umberto Eco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Umberto Eco recognizes in Roman Jakobson a central role in clarifying and disseminating the notions of code and message, extending them from the field of information theory to the whole of semiotics. The adoption of these categories made it possible to unify the analysis of linguistic and non-linguistic systems, providing a coherent methodological framework for describing the...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Substance to Semiosis: The Relational Meaning of Privation</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/from-substance-to-semiosis-the-relational-meaning-of-privation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Deely insists that Aristotle’s framework is not dualistic but trialistic. Against the widespread simplification that reduces his philosophy to a doctrine of matter and form—hylomorphism—Deely reminds us that Aristotle posits threeinseparable principles: “matter (hyle), form (morphe), and privation (steresis).” As Deely writes, “privation gets more or less swept aside in the history of philosophy, and the...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Umberto Eco: The Subject as Semiosis in Act</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/umberto-eco-the-subject-as-semiosis-in-act/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Husserl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrizia Violi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trattato di semiotica generale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umberto Eco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After the publication of&#160;Il nome della rosa, Umberto Eco replied to a journalist who asked where the author’s subjectivity could be found in the novel by saying that “the subject is in the adverbs.” What might have sounded like a witty remark was later interpreted by Patrizia Violi as an effective synthesis of an entire...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Umberto Eco, A Missed History: The Ostracism of Semiotics</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/umberto-eco-a-missed-history-the-ostracism-of-semiotics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Sanders Peirce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles W. Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferdinand de Saussure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis Hjelmslev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Jakobson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umberto Eco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In his 1976 essay, Umberto Eco retraces the long and fragmented history of reflections on signs, highlighting how semiotics—despite its ancient roots—was persistently marginalized by the scientific establishment. The idea of a science dedicated to the production, exchange, and interpretation of signs is far from new: even pre-Socratic poetry and philosophy had shown an interest...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semiotics and the Ethical Dimension of Life</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/semiotics-and-the-ethical-dimension-of-life/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Augusto Ponzio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ferdinand de Saussure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics and Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Petrilli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Albert Sebeok]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In&#160;Semiotics in Ethics and Caring, Susan Petrilli affirms that an ethical dimension is implicit in every form of human semiosis. Yet only recently has it become a consistent object of semiotic inquiry. Drawing on Thomas A. Sebeok’s notion of&#160;global semiotics, she argues that reconnecting semiotics with the life sciences allows the discipline to extend beyond...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title> “Relations Are the Children of Interactions”: Relation as the Core of Semiosis</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/relations-are-the-children-of-interactions-relation-as-the-core-of-semiosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In&#160;Semiosis and Human Understanding, John Deely states that “you really can’t get very deep into semiotics without involving relations.” For him, relation—rather than substance, perception, or consciousness—is the&#160;formal heart&#160;of semiosis. Yet, as he observes, “in the history of philosophy, there is no concept more talked about and less thought about than relation.” Deely begins with...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
