<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Narration &#8211; Semiotica</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.semiotica.org/tag/narration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.semiotica.org</link>
	<description>Dalla scienza dei segni alla semiotica del testo. Il campo semiotico e le teorie della significazione</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 06:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>From Substance to Semiosis: The Relational Meaning of Privation</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/from-substance-to-semiosis-the-relational-meaning-of-privation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Deely insists that Aristotle’s framework is not dualistic but trialistic. Against the widespread simplification that reduces his philosophy to a doctrine of matter and form—hylomorphism—Deely reminds us that Aristotle posits threeinseparable principles: “matter (hyle), form (morphe), and privation (steresis).” As Deely writes, “privation gets more or less swept aside in the history of philosophy, and the...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Abstract Syntax to Semantic Concreteness</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/from-abstract-syntax-to-semantic-concreteness/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algirdas Julien Greimas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrizia Magli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics of the text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umberto Eco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To narrate means to construct a world. Eco affirms this, and adds that such a world must be “so concrete that one can imagine stepping into it.” A world that stands “before our eyes,” where even the smallest details can be perceived, and that becomes populated with words almost spontaneously, as soon as we visualize...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
