<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Deely &#8211; Semiotica</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.semiotica.org/tag/john-deely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.semiotica.org</link>
	<description>Dalla scienza dei segni alla semiotica del testo. Il campo semiotico e le teorie della significazione</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 13:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>it-IT</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Semiology or Semiotics? A Theoretical Divergence in the History of Sign Studies</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/semiology-or-semiotics-a-theoretical-divergence-in-the-history-of-sign-studies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 12:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Sanders Peirce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics and language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Albert Sebeok]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=3492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In contemporary discussions of signs, the distinction between “semiology” and “semiotics” is not merely terminological. John Deely shows that this divergence involves two different ways of conceiving the sign, language, and the relation between culture and nature. Deely first reconstructs the lexicographical history of the two terms. “Semiology” appears in English dictionaries as early as...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Semiotic Animal and the Ethics of Responsibility</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/the-semiotic-animal-and-the-ethics-of-responsibility/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Augusto Ponzio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bachtin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metasemiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semioethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiotics and Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Petrilli]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Susan Petrilli develops the notion of&#160;semioethics&#160;by grounding it in a specific conception of the human being: the human as&#160;semiotic animal. This expression, introduced in the volume&#160;Semiotic Animal&#160;co-authored with John Deely and Augusto Ponzio, designates a life form endowed not only with the capacity for semiosis, but with a distinctive aptitude for&#160;metasemiosis—the ability to reflect on...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Substance to Semiosis: The Relational Meaning of Privation</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/from-substance-to-semiosis-the-relational-meaning-of-privation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=2017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Deely insists that Aristotle’s framework is not dualistic but trialistic. Against the widespread simplification that reduces his philosophy to a doctrine of matter and form—hylomorphism—Deely reminds us that Aristotle posits threeinseparable principles: “matter (hyle), form (morphe), and privation (steresis).” As Deely writes, “privation gets more or less swept aside in the history of philosophy, and the...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title> “Relations Are the Children of Interactions”: Relation as the Core of Semiosis</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/relations-are-the-children-of-interactions-relation-as-the-core-of-semiosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 09:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semiosis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In&#160;Semiosis and Human Understanding, John Deely states that “you really can’t get very deep into semiotics without involving relations.” For him, relation—rather than substance, perception, or consciousness—is the&#160;formal heart&#160;of semiosis. Yet, as he observes, “in the history of philosophy, there is no concept more talked about and less thought about than relation.” Deely begins with...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Augustine and the Birth of a General Notion of Sign</title>
		<link>https://www.semiotica.org/augustine-and-the-birth-of-a-general-notion-of-sign/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Semiotica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2025 08:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agostino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umberto Eco]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.semiotica.org/?p=1802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In&#160;Semiosis and Human Understanding, John Deely recalls that the very possibility of semiotics as a discipline—what he calls&#160;doctrina signorum—appeared only “late in the 4th century AD,” when Augustine of Hippo formulated, for the first time in recorded thought, a&#160;general notion of sign&#160;that embraced both nature and culture. According to Deely, Augustine proposed that&#160;“a sign is...]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
